Failure Analysis
Corrosion Failures
Corrosion is one of the greatest problems encountered with
produced fluids and accounts for about one-half of all sucker
rod failures. Corrosion is the destructive result of an electrochemical
reaction between the steel used in making sucker rods and the
operating environment to which it is subjected. Simply put,
corrosion is nature's way of reverting a man-made material
of a higher energy state (steel), back to its basic condition
(native ore) as it is found in nature. The elemental iron in
steel combines with moisture or acids, to form other compounds
such as iron oxide, sulfide, carbonate, etc. Some form and
concentration of water is present in all wells considered corrosive
and most contain considerable quantities of dissolved impurities
and gases. For instance, carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen
sulfide (H2S) acid gases, common in most wells, are highly
soluble and readily dissolve in water which tends to lower
its pH. The corrosivity of the water is a function of the amount
of these two gases that are held in solution. All waters with
low pH values are considered corrosive to steel, with lower
values representing greater acidity, or corrosiveness.
All downhole environments
are corrosive to
some degree. Some
corrosive fluids
may be considered
non-corrosive if
the corrosion penetration
rate, recorded as
mils of thickness
lost per year (mpy),
is low enough that
it will not cause
problems. However,
most producing wells
are plagued by corrosion
problems and no currently
manufactured sucker
rod can successfully
withstand the effects
of this corrosion
alone. While corrosion
cannot be completely
eliminated it is
possible to control
its reaction. All
grades of sucker
rods must be adequately
protected through
the use of effective
chemical inhibition
programs (reference
current editions
of API Specification
11BR and NACE Standard
RPO195). Some sucker
rod grades, due to
different combinations
of alloying elements,
microstructures and
hardness levels,
are capable of longer
service life in inhibited
corrosive wells than
other grades of either
low or high tensile
strength.
Why do new sucker
rods seem to corrode
faster than older
rods in the same
string? Two sucker
rods with the same
chemical analysis
will form a galvanic
corrosion cell if
the physical condition
of one is different
from the other. Physical
differences in a
sucker rod may be
caused from poor
care and handling
practices (i.e. surface
damage resulting
in bruises, nicks,
bends) and/or corrosion
deposits. Since new
sucker rods go into
the well without
corrosion deposits,
they often corrode
preferentially in
relation to rods
that are coated with
corrosion deposits.
Corrosion on steel
starts very aggressively
but often slows down
as soon as an obstructive
surface film of corrosion
deposit (scale) is
formed upon the metal
surface. For example,
CO2 generates iron
carbonate scale as
a by-product of its
corrosion. This scale
coats the sucker
rod and retards the
corrosion penetration
rate, which tends
to slow down corrosion.
However, if this
deposit is continuously
cracked by a bending
movement or removed
by abrasion, aggressive
local corrosion continues
on the area with
the scale removed,
and results in deep
corrosion pitting.
Can high tensile
strength sucker rods
be used in a corrosive
environment? Generally
soft rods tolerate
corrosion better
than hard rods and,
as a rule of thumb,
you should always
use the softest rod
that will handle
the load. However,
if load requirements
dictate the use of
high tensile strength
rods then it is important
to protect the rods
with an effective
surface film of corrosion
inhibitor. In most
cases, if you can
adequately protect
downhole equipment
from corrosion, you
should be able to
adequately protect
high tensile strength
rods from corrosion
by increasing the
application frequency
of the corrosion-inhibitor
program. In other
words, if you effectively
batch treat once
a week with 40 parts
per million (ppm)
of corrosion inhibitor
for D class rods,
you will need to
batch treat twice
weekly with 40 ppm
of corrosion inhibitor
for high tensile
strength rods. Treatment
volumes vary and
are dependent upon
many factors too
numerous to list.
Always consult with
a corrosion control
specialist prior
to the installation
of every rod string,
especially when stress
corrosion fatigue
is suspected as the
failure root cause.
Figure 18 is an
example of stress-corrosion
fatigue from CO2
corrosion. The size
of the pit, as far
as when it becomes
detrimental to the
rod, depends on two
factors-material
type and hardness.
Class K sucker rods
may develop deeper
and larger pits than
a Class D sucker
rod before it becomes
detrimental to the
rods. Class D sucker
rods may develop
deeper and larger
pits than a high
tensile strength
rod before it becomes
detrimental to the
rods. Softer materials
with lower rod stress
tolerate larger pits
than do harder materials
with higher rod stress.
Therefore, small
pits can be detrimental
to higher tensile
strength sucker rods
as opposed to a softer
rod that does not
have as much rod
stress.
|
|
|